Las Vegas City Commission Minutes, November 7, 1949 to May 21, 1952, lvc000007-244

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT The Mayor announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commis- No. 100-3 sioners and the Ex-Officio City Assessor of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, to meet and Assessment Roll review the assessments and hear any objection to said assessment which may be made on Public Hearing the proposed improvements in Assessment District No. 100-3, as shown on Assessment Roll No. 13-1950. The Mayor then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had. been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City Clerk answered there had been no objections filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Mayor then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any objection, suggestion or comment, or raise any question concerning said special assessment roll.. No such objec­tion, suggestion, comment or question was made or raised. The Mayor thereupon publicly announced that no objection, suggestion, comment or question had been made or raised, written or otherwise by any party in interest, or otherwise, to the said special assessment roll. Commissioner Peccole moved that the hearing on this Assessment Roll No. 13-1950 be ad­journed until after the construction contract has been let to-wit: January 17, 1951, at which adjourned meeting the Assessment Roll will.be corrected or revised before confirm­ation to correct typographical or clerical errors and to modify all the assessments if the construction price should prove to be substantially different from the estimated price. Motion seconded by Commissioner Bunker and carried by the following vote: Those voting "Aye": Commissioner Bunker Commissioner Moore Commissioner Peccole Commissioner Whipple Mayor Cragin Those voting "Nay": None ASSESSMENT DISTRICT The Mayor announced that this was the time and place designated for the Board of Commis- NO. 100-7 sioners and the Ex-officio City Assessor of the City of Las Vegas, Nevada, to meet and Public Hearing review the assessments and hear any objection to said assessment which may be made on the Assessment Roll proposed improvements in Assessment District No. 100-7, as shown on. Assessment Roll No. 14-1950. The Mayor then asked if any written objections concerning said assessment roll had been filed in the office of the City Clerk. The City: Clerk answered there had been no objec­tions filed in her office prior to said meeting. The Mayor then publicly asked if anyone desired to make any objection, suggestion or comment, or raise any question concerning said special assessment roll. No such objec­tion, suggestion, comment or question was made or raised. The Mayor thereupon publicly announced that no objection, suggestion, comment or question had been made or raised, written or otherwise by any party in interest,, or otherwise, to the said special assessment roll. Commissioner Whipple moved the following Assessment Roll No. 14-1950 covering assessments on South Main Street Lighting, Assessment District No. 100-7, be approved and confirmed; ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 14-1950 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 100-7 LOCATION: Block 4, Clark's Las Vegas Townsite LOT NAME &. ADDRESS OF OWNER LAND & IMPR FRONT COST ___ ________________________ ASSESSMENTS..................FOOTAGE . ____ 1,2 S. Gene & Anna J. Parks (½.int) $2650. 30.0 $93.25 Edith Ann Jennings (½ int) 132 South 1st Street City 3,4 H. P. and Ityrtle Marble (½ int) $1900. 50.0 $93.25 A. G. and Zora Grant (½ int) 4340. Box 431 City 5,6,7,8 Ed Von Tobel $3600. 100.0 $186.50 214 South 2nd Street 980. City 9 Francesca Romo $900. 25.0 $46.63 217 South Main Street 850. City 10,11 Henry F. Barnewolt $1800. 50.0 $93.25 999 North Raymond Avenue Pasadena, California 12 thru 16 Josephine Pecetto $8300. 125.0 $233.13 227 South Main Street City