upr000065 229

Mr# ft# M# Sattoa 3 February 1* Xf5^ 9* 4 detailed of tH* Joint facility rant bill for tho jrwr 1951 {"fS!4"*:. etantlally ia the wanner of Exhibit ft la IMS caae. It would be helpful if the var- leu* classes of expenses, web a# supervi- •loo# «aaagament, etc., were shewn by sub- tot sia ia thia exhibit. I think ws should al«o she* la this exhibit by wit of cowpar- Iogm the ittns ia tho Joist facility Font bill for tha yaar 195©* la eoaaeetiou with t ila exhibit I am wondering whether any re­vision has been msde of the estimates for lupoFTi si on aaft aiiifigo®oat oxfosooi* It ap­pears to »« that thoao era expenses which eaa vary from year to year and that s©»« attempt should be made to have each expens­es brought up to date eaeh year• 10. 11. &s a separate statement I believe It would be desirable to have « detailed statement relating to the items in the joint facility rent bill is which there have been substan­tial increases In the year 1951. 1 presume that the Increase in the 1951 bill has been largely due to direct labor and material coats. A statement of the operating revenues and ^xrensea &£ the Las Vegas t*aed and at or leapsny fdr the year 1951 a« compared to the yesr 1950, prepared substantially as in Exhibit in this case. 12. stabcoasts show lag the detail of the op­eration and maintenance expenses and the administrative and general expenses-for the year 1951 shown in the exhibit re­quested under Item 11. iftr# Sarsoa will recall that Mr. Ulan showed a great deal of interest in the detail'of these expens­es in our recent conference with Hi*.