upr000066 99

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 ft sap was mad* by him, 1 sade ©edifications on the sap to shew ear project, Q, I was referring to a study rather than a surrey, das an engineering firs brought in to sake a study ©f the project? A. It was—the firs of Oreeley and Hansen* fres Chicago. Q, In the nature of a feasibility report? A, fes, sir, Q« Md that engineering firs establish a per capita use ©f water within the City ef las Vegas? A, They computed the maximum dally consumption of 16.7 silllcn gallons and a per capita use of 6b0 gallons per day* tak­ing a maximum of Id. 7 silllem gallons for the twenty-four hours* which was tho maximum uso that dreeley A Hanson found fres the charts* which gave a per capita consumption daily of 6hO gallons, Q, And that was for the year 19**8? A, fes* sir| the saxlsu* day ef 19MJ, This study was sade, Mr. Cannon* in the fall of 19^9? beginning in the late sismer* and the lpMft full year records had to be depended on principally, Q, And that usage Is considerably higher than the estlsate used by Mr, Anderson in his report* to which you hoard his testify this sensing• A, fes* sir, f* Colonel Clark* in your study* did you also study the availability of additional waters in the immediate vicinity of las Vegas? A, Ho; the study was practically centered at lake Mead and lendersen, We realised that the State Engineer had studied the