upr000067 275

V Draft ( Mr. Leo A, McNamee Page 2 November 24, 1952 available In case the present well should fall, I do not think the District will object to that modification. With respect to sub-division BC" of the District proposal, I have reworded it, I hope while you are considering this new draft, you have prepared small maps to be attached to the new bid to be submitted by the District showing the lands to be conveyed, and also hope to have the contract covering the relocation of the pipe lines, subject of your letter of November 4th, redrafted, so that a copy thereof can be attached to the new proposal. In that way we will have everything pretty well completed so our executives will be able to understand the proposal and the facilities involved. With respect to sub-division "DM I have included two wells as excluded from the transfer of our water production facilities, both of these being designated as Las Vegas Land and Water Co. wells, and both being imme­diately adjacent to the Ranch. I understand both of these wells are very small, an<3 ;I do not think the District is interested in pur­chasing them. Incidentally, these two wells are in Section 27, With respect to sub-division MRH I have made a slight clarification in that, which I do not,believe will be objectionable to the District, I I have added a new sub-division *'g ” relative to those railroad 9-A contracts which I have felt advisable to refer to in the pro­posal, Possibly you can Improve upon the word­ing, or possibly you prefer to include such a provision in the contract to be prepared for the sale of the properties, et al, but that is some- 2 -