upr000070 361

$' MR. L. R. MAAG February 9, 195^ 36-15 Nev. Mr. Howard W, Cannon 125 South Second Street Las Vegas, Nevada, Dear Mr. Cannons Referring to our telephone conversation relative to the desire of the City of Las Vegas to secure certain sewer arrangements over the property of Union Pacific and property of the Las Vegas Land and Water Company, which is under contract to be sold to the Las Vegas Water Dis­trict: I have discussed this matter with our people here, and since our contract with the Water their consent, and since we have found Ditshte riWcatt err eDqiuisrtersi ct mofo vetshi ss lnoawtluyr ei ths avweo ntdoe rbse teo xepceurtfeordm ,b y anedx ecsuitnicvee se aisne mOemnathsa , aX cboenldieemvnea tiito nw ousluidt baen dm ugceht sainm polredre ri fo ft hei mmCeidtiya tseh opuolsd sefsi­le sion. I think in such a suit the Water District should be msoamdee oaf ptahret y lasnidnsc eb yt hveiyr tduoe haofv e thaen cionncthroaactte iinn tqeureesstti oinn. Mseoamne whmielteh,o d weof cgarna nbtei nwgo rekaisnegm eonutts wtiot h thteh eC iWtayt,e r ifD itshterict District is agreeable, and the suit can be dismissed a s against both the District, and the Water Company, and th e Railroad. I presume you will probably include some other psaerwetri esl inteos thiinsd icsautiets ats hamty tihnefyo rwmialtli otnr awnistvhe rrsees pelcatn dst on tohte owned by either the Water Company, the Railroad, or poten ­tially by the Water District. I such a suiIt woius ldf ilaepdp raencdi atoer deirf yofo up owsousleds siaodnv issee cumree dw.h en I