upr000090 106

Draft Hi Mr. Lao A, McNamee Page 2 November 24, 1952 available In case the present well should fall. X do not think the Dlatrlet will object to that modification* With reapect to sub-division *CH of the District proposal, I have reworded it. 1 hope while you are considering this new draft, you have prepared small maps to be attached to the new bid to be submitted by the District showing the lands to be conveyed, and also hope to have the contract covering O the relocation of the pipe lines, subject of your letter of November 4th, redrafted, so that a copy thereof can be attached to the new proposal* In that way we will have everything pretty well completed so our executives will be able to understand the proposal and the facilities involved* With respect to sub-division I have included two wells as excluded from the transfer of our water production facilities, both of these being designated as Las Vegas Land and Water Co. wells, and both being imme- * dlately adjacent to the Ranch* I understand both of these wells are very small, and I do not think the District is Interested in pur­chasing them. Incidentally, these two wells are in Section 27, With reapect to sub-division I have made a slight clarification in that, which I do not believe will be objectionable to the District, I I have added a new sub-division ttF” . “ relative/to those railroad 9-A contracts/Which i have felt advisable to refer to in the pro- . : posal. Possibly you\can Improve upon the word­ing, or possibly youprefer to include such a ^ provision in the -contract to be prepared for the ; sale of the properties, et al, but that is some- -2-