upr000090 109

shop well, all as outlined In my letter to Mr. Reinhardt, copy to you, March 6, 1952, The description of the shop well as given in (b) is correct. The State Engineer’s local field number for the shop well Is 159; however, our records do not indicate that permit number was ever applied for by Rail­road Company or granted by the State. In event a new well should be located within radius of 100 ft. from the present well, it would place the two wells too close together; also, the new well would be located within the limits of existing shop buildings and facilities, which would be very objectionable. We should have the right to drill the addition­al well at a suitable location within grounds. limits, of shop (c) It appears to me that it might be well to use the word ”temporary” immediately before the word '’rights-of-way” in lines 1 and 4 of (c) on page 2. However, the wording of (c) states that rights-of-way and easements are subject to an agreement to be executed between Rail­road Companies and the District In the form marked wExhibit B and made a part hereof”, which agreement provides for temporary and permanent easement, and because of this, it might not be necessary to Insert the word ”temporary” as mentioned above. (d) The wording of this item appears satisfactory, with the following exceptions: 1 - Apparently the District, In addition to the shop well, Intends to exclude LVL&WCo. Well No. 2, drilled in April, 1949, Work Order No. 598, located in Section 27. Item (d) states this well is in Section 26, and, without doubt, this refers to the LVL&WCo. Well No. 2, which is actually located in Section 27, a short distance east of Fifth Street highway. No mention is made of LVL&WCo. Well No. 1, which was drilled in 1959, and is also located in Section 27 on the parcel of land which LVL&WCo. recently sold to the Mormon Church. Well No. 1 and water rights in this well and under the property sold, together with access to the well from