Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000092 33

Information

Digital ID
upr000092-033
Permalink
http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1ht2jf5d
Details
Member of
LVLWC - proposed sale of water production facilities of UPRRC
Rights
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

(bcc - Mr* E. Mr. R. Mr. W. Mr, F. Mr. L. E. L. H. A. R. Bennett (2) Adamson ) Hulsizsr ) Hubbard | Maag (2) f June 26, 1952 Mr. Dames M« Xontgeaery Consulting Engineer 15 North Oakland Avenue Pasadena 1, California Dear Mr. Montgomery: In aeeordance with the understanding between you and Sir. M&asc. of my office, 2 have this date handed you three copies of a 3-paga statement dated dune If, 1952, showing a comparison of values arrived at in the appraisals Pre­pared by engineers for the Railroad Company and your of­fice ueting as engineers for the later District. The attached statement is divided to show separately reproduction cost new and reproduction coat new less de­preciation, together with a summary showing a comparison of the results developed by the two appraisals and the differences developed therein. fhe summary also shows amounts representing total ad­ditions for the period, January 1, 1951, JjjJ*** 1 These additions were developed by taking the vestment cost of additions separately for the J u n c t i o n Facilities and Distribution Facilities and applying the following percentages to bring them to the basis oi re­production coot as of May 1, 1952t Production facilities* 155.025 recorded investment cost plus 5* to cover freight and 2.7065* to cover overhead percentages, resulting in a total of #62,206. Mflfcrlbdfrlan Keel lit iaa.: 1172,290 recorded investment cost plus 6 .359! to cover overhead percentages,result-isag li a total of | l « 3 , m .