upr000115 255

l+-Inoh: The principal differen ce appears to be in KO-79* the statement attached to your le tte r indicating 11,170 f t . in stalled whereas Form **907 re fle cts 12,238 f t . $ 6 - In oh: Principal differences are In ^0-233, bardie Addition lin e s , which our f i l e Indicates consisted o f 2683 f t . o f 6rt o*st iron , compared with 1500 f t . shown in statement attached to your le t t e r . I attach copy o f f’r . Bracken’ s le tte r May 18, 193k to Mr. Adams on this sub­je c t . The remaining differen ce under this* diameter o f pipe was due to our taking into account the 1610 f t . o f 6rt pipe under \Q-k7Q, Huntridge Unit No. 6, referred to above, and this w ill o f course be adjusted with completion o f accounting under tills Kork Order in our ||S|j report. W ill be glad to have your oonvurrence in the footage figures shown in our recapitulation sheet attached, with the expl&natl n offered above. Because o f the lim ited time l e f t in which to submit our Annual Report to the Nevada Publio Service Commission, we have tentatively adopted, subject to your approval, the footages in attached re-oap sheet as the number o f fe e t in place as o f January 1, 1947, adding thereto the new In stallation s made during the ye- r . Please disregard the coat figures shown on our statement under “Remarks% as they are intended only fo r purposes o f comparison and to indicate why, as in the case o f authority M-2, no work order was issued to cover. A. M. Folger