upr000160 78

Mr. Wm. Reinhardt December 11, 1951 They seemed to be rather hesitant to write such a letter and Mr. Hamilton, representing the 0‘Melveny firm and also the District, felt that the prospective purchaser of the bonds should state what provisions they feel should be Incor­porated In such bonds before they would be accepted. I told - / -? 'r-:,- ft | y V ^ y . 1 pjf " , |i „ V-/’f ^ | f ;? him I thought that since his firm was employed to pass upon the proceedings of the District and would probably have to give a report as to the legality of the bonds, that such Information should erne from them or from the District. The matter was therefore left In abeyance and X hope to get in touch with Mr. Hamilton in the near future in an effort to ascertain just who is going to initiate this part­icular phase of the'matter. The next question brought up was with respect to our dismissing the present application for discontinuance of installation of future water mains or the making of any new water connections. I told them that at the present time X would not recommend dismissal of this application and that those were your views. X explained to them that the applica­tion had been filed approximately six months ago and although it received considerable publicity, in the newspapers, no effort was made by anyone to conserve water in the city and that no one in the city paid any attention to the application and that many new subdivisions have been started since the application was filed. 1| si