upr000160 87

Los &i*g®$e#V December 21, 1951 ir* falter Jl* * 'ms#i (cc * Mr* a« s * . " to w a rd .Sir* feie*'.%inh*r4i Mr* ¥ . $* - I te ls is e r $r* i« pi 'Sutt««' Mr. C alv in ||f; Cory) t htv@ e .copy ftf year letter -jf feeceiBfier 1#, X951 t© Mr-, -Stoddard r e f e r r in g .to th e si|fl^ 6 stien » c o n ta in e d ? ? in '-mf l e t t e r of ' ec ember 4} 1951.* 'id ; Mr* fieinfeerdt r©~ lasting: fr©44eti©ii: f a c t t i t l e # . " i p i 'l p I s l l r e e d e t .'tee £#?*£*» to a ? s e p a ra te 44a* t r i b u t i e i i Conway* . | | | th e p r e s e n t tisse &y view s 4# t o t b s <| n e s t io n s y a# r a is e d in your l e t t e r epos which yon da-sire my comments a re b n ly te n ta t iv e * However I sis w ritin g you .now t o /a# .40' #nf$£e#t -th e t t o i^veetijgdSftJtoWi fee made my | E p r o p e r d e p a r t is f its .-n# t o tit© f e a s i b i l i t y of th e H oiirfeed Company’s d ev e lo p in g i t # own w a te r su p p ly If 'th e .tr a n s f e r of th e w ater p ro d u c t io n f i t i l i l i s s l o c a t ­ed in th e ..water f t # i d which co rv es dom estic, 'w ater to th e C ity of Im Ve^fe# 1# conaiwsmat s d . . ®y p re s e n t view 4s t h a t th e r e would fee seat*, d i f f i ­c u lty i n weiring:. a • c o n tra c t whereby th e d i s t r i b u t i o n com­pany could fu rn is h th e Hs 11 road Company ®!* a s s u re d sup­p ly o f n o t l « a t th e n 2*5 cu b ic f e e t o f w ater p e r second jjffee t«ll**o*4, e a p p r o p r ia tio n o f 2*5 c o b le f e e t o f ".ym&Qfr pnr s-scond r e l a t e s t o w ell ##* 1 in th e w ate r f i e l d , which would | i so ld to t h e _d is trib u tio n ;c o m p a n y , and. th e d i s t r i b u t i o n company would become th e o p e r a to r o f th e w e ll end th e tra n s m is s io n system th ro u g h which th e w ate r would be d e liv e re d , to . th e t a i l ro ad Company*- s in c e th e d i s t r i b u t i o n company would be a p u b lic u t i l - i t v , 1 doubt i f i t would p a b le t o make a .v a l i d con­t r a c t whereby i t co u ld f u r n is h | supply, ©f w ater a t c o s t , which would fee paramount to ' th e r i g h t of- o th e r p e rso n s se rv e d fey th e u t i l i t y * , uch a c o n tr a c t would fee s u b je c t t o th e claim th a t i t mm d is c rim in a ­to r y end in v i o l a t i o n o f th e s t a t u t e # w hich p r o h ib it, © . u t i l i t y from c h a rg in g a g r e a te r o r l e s s com pensation