upr000173 310

Mr. frank Strongs ( cc - Mr. £. E. Bannatt Mr. 0. M. Cory) Work Order 5*>9 of February 1, 19b7, auth­orised construction of 6-inch water main through H o o k a 17 and 25 of lbth Street Add'a for W. W. Cantrell, un­der Rule 9-A at an estimated coat of #3720.00. However, at Cantrell* a request we extended the main through H o o k 25 only, at a ooat of #19^5.03 (plus usual peroentagea or #2139.53)# bolding the authority open until subdivider was ready to ©omplete H o o k 17. Please aee your S-39 to Mr. Guild, February 27, 19^7. Cantrell has been unable to enquire ownership of all lota In H o o k 17, hut haa entered Into a co­operative arrangement with the other owner# under whloh they will eaoh advanoe their reapeotlve ah&ree of the cost, aa follows* W. W. Cantrell #955.00 J # i § i y. 0. Griswold 755.00 33.M% B. B. Moody 550.00 2b.33# total - #2260.00 loO.OO# it haa been neoesaary to revise the estimate to conform to increased coats, and detail of estimate la attaohad in the amount of #2260.00, whloh the sub-dividers are advancing. However, there appears to be sufficient money in the contingency fund to that the actual cost will not exoeed the Work Order authority, ao far aa ©an be determined at this time. We are now ready to draw up the agreement, and question ariaas aa to the beat method of refunding. Xn view of the fact that thee# three men do not own all, but merely a majority, of the lots in H o o k 17, it is hardly equitable to make individual refunds on the basis of the number of lots owned by eaoh. Therefore, X suggest that the refunds of* (a) Difference between estimated and actual coat, and (b) fifty per cent of revenues accruing from water main installed in H o c k 1?. l»aa Vegao - May 10, IfbS W 2 >1-29