upr000174 72

4-;Enoh: The principal in WO-79, the statement attached dtoi fyfoeruern lcee ttapepre airnsd ictao tihneg 11,170 ft. installed whereas Form 4f§7 reflects 12,238 ft. bardie Add6it-iIonnc hl: inePsr,i nwcihpiaclh doiufrf efrielnec eisn dairceat eisn WcOo-n2s3i3s,ted of 2683 ft. of 6* cast iron, compared with 1500 ft. shown in Statement attached to your letter. 1 attach copy ©f Hr. Bracken's letter May 18, 193^ to Mr. Adams on this sub­ject. The remaining difference under this diameter of pipe was due to our taking into account the 1610 ft. of 6* pipe under WO-470, Huntrldge ©nit No. 6, referred to above, and this will of course bs adjusted with completion of accounting under this Work Order in our f w f report. Will be glad to have your concurrence in the footage figures shown in our recapitulation sheet attached, with the explanation offered above. Because of the limited time left in which to submit our Annual Report to the Nevada Public Service OommiBSion, we have tentatively adopted, subject to your approval, the footages in attached re-cap sheet as the number of feet in place as of January 1, W 7 , adding thereto the new installations made during the year* Please disregard the cost figures shown on our statement under •Remarks", as they are intended only for purposes of comparison and to indicate why, as in the case of authority K-2, no work order was issued to cover. »*2— A. M. Folger Z