upr000186 130

4 Mr. G.M. Gory L & a Vegas - Marsh 16, 1953* Heferring to the case of Mr. KacPeok, President of Valley Enterprises, Inc., who is now In rroeesa of oonstruot- fn& * building over a 4* water line located in LVL&v/CO. easement held oy this company across the northerly 10* of tot N, Park Place Addition, Lae Vegas, which easement is Deeds, Pages 36 to 39. recorded in Book *38 of In addition to the new building under construction there is also an existing concrete block building which w&s previ­ously constructed over the earns easement also owned by Mr. MaePeck. Mr. M&cFeok has made the statement to me that he does portion of the pips line adjacent to 5th street is within the limits of the easement. While I feel that the pipe line does in fact lie within the easement, X do not think that we should go to the expense of making a survey at the present- time as I under­stand that the north line of Lot H was established many years ago and is the subject of some dispute among local surveyors. he had agreed ^ tor ebmeianrde dt heM r.e xKpaeonPsee cko f trheatl ocian tpirnegv itohuiss pciopnev elrisantei oannsd he stated that he would be willing to sign any agreement which I mjiecgth,t pofr epcoaurres ec,o vetro inagp prhoisv alb eaofr ihnigs tahtet oerxnpeeynss.e of relocation, sub­Mr* Beinhardt has suggested to me that while he does not think this matter is of very great importance, ho feels that we is hnegr naibao unto t suaclhlo wan & epnrcercoaecdhemnetn tt.o be established in which we do noth­ment for Mr. MIanc Pveicekw» «jo f sitghnea taubroev,e , inw iwlhl icyho uh ep lweoausled p raegpreaer e toa nb Aegarr eet­he expense o f relocating the pipe line in the event it fceoasc necessary to perform maintenance work on It at a later date and would also gree to furnish an easement for the relocation o f thin line of oame necessary to relocate the line off the present easement. S*» it be* LHMlan