upr000282 250

Kae-k I| » #^S6* 4©0*0O representing tahles oe sotmiimtatteedd farmoo®u nitt so fr atthse ^ 5flr?#l4^ advance* which have been deposited™ f ? L S ^ d•ls^S^ C* t^i*o^n* «on» Ejxphiipb® itl i3n1e,s , teatbcl.e lSt in3c(ec ),t hiI s tietTemW Sish excluded it from my restatement on Statement A* i..t. s rat. e b*a*s e i®t hael sion vneosttmeedn tt haetx ptehned itCuormemsi sseisotni madtide d notto buese ini-n eurred during the year 1952. which for LA4S1 ER.Co.is ? S M , per Exhibit 17# and for 1VL&W So # is #67,526.92, per Exhibit 22# if interesting to note that the Commission Haiti |®J bearing lands to 240 acres, whereas in the proposal of Valley hater hi strict to acquire the property, it aleanntds* c5o0n7s ifsotr eso*f 6m79i.s42 ianc rceosn#trast to our contention that such iota Commission has computed Federal incoaa taxes at and 22> surtax to tbhye spspamley iasmgo uInOft anfotremra l detdauxc ttion gt he# 25f,u0l0l0 *a0m0o*unt According to the Commission's estimates, under the rates granted and for a f u n year's operation*, the ! ¥ M M So* wSitih additionaadld irteiveonnuael roefv e#n9u2e, 4o05f* #0601 ,3r6e3q,u6e5s,Xt£e d whiinc hT abcloem plaar.es ejxShjiJbJiItf 3If1 i*nR 1}9Ee5i2** aQd ®l°7f7l^#00 requested in fable 5 of hno* 1/ Represents item 4a page 9 • 4b * 9 ” that portion of the 1951 increase of #25,112.00 which is assumed to be included in item 4 (see page 69 of the petition for reconsideration or rehearing) #17,526*30 55,465.35 /