Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000284 69

Information

Digital ID
upr000284-069
    Details
    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Publisher
    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Mr. Wm. Reinhardt Page 5 July 6, 1951 The Commission, in a very lengthy opin ion, d iscu ssed the a v a i l a b i l i t y o f w ater to the c i t i e s served by the C a lifo r n ia Water & Telephone Company, p a r t ic u la r ly the c i t i e s o f Chula V is ta and N atio n al C ity, and a d jo in ­in g t e r r it o r y in San Diego County, and found that there was a g re a t excess o f water d e liv e re d to those two p a rt­ic u la r c i t i e s over and above the useage to which they were e n t it le d from the San Diego County Water A uth ority which was o b ta in in g w ater through the San Diego Aqueduct, a branch o f the Colorado R iv er Aqueduct o f the M etrop oli­tan Water D is t r ic t o f Southern C a lifo r n ia . The Commission a ls o found that the two r e s e r v o ir s o f the w ater company with a capacity o f 52,000 acre fe e t , p re se n tly have useable storage o f approxim ately 6,000 acre f e e t , which the a p p lic an t estim ates would be reduced to 2,500 acre fe e t by December 31, 1951. The Company has been g e tt in g excess w ater fo r the c i t i e s in question from c e rta in su rp lu s w ater from the C ity o f San Diego and has been n o t if ie d th at the City o f San Diego would re q u ire i t s f u l l allotm ent o f Colorado R iv er Water commencing May 1, 1951. The Commission a ls o found th at there were pre­lim in ary p lan s and d esigns fo r con struction o f a second b a r r e l o f the San Diego Aqueduct, which would be completed in 1953 o r 1954, and which would e n t it le a p p lic a n t to an a d d itio n a l supply o f w ater, which a s a m atter o f fa c t would only make up the d efic ie n c y now overcome by the use o f the surplus w ater made a v a ila b le by the City o f San D iego. The Commission thereupon issu e d i t s Order perm it­tin g amendment to Rule No. 2 o f the Rules and R egu lation s o f the Sweetwater D is t r ic t o f - the ap p lican t by adding to s a id ru le the fo llo w in g language: "No a p p lic a tio n fo r the extension o f se rv ic e to any su b d iv isio n , as h e re in a fte r d efin ed , w i l l be granted nor se rv ic e rend­ered to such su bd ivisio n u n less a p p lic a tio n th e re fo r has been made on or p r io r to A p r il 13, 1951, except as h e re in a fte r provided. "A su b d iv isio n i s d efin ed as any lan d o r lan d s, d iv id e d o r proposed to be d iv id e d , f o r the purpose o f s a le or le a s e , immediate or fu tu re , in to f iv e (5 ) o r more lo t s or p a r c e ls .