Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Letter from Franklin T. Hamilton (Los Angeles) to Thomas A. Campbell (Las Vegas), October 21, 1955

Information

Creator
Date
1955-10-21
Description

Discussion of the courts holding the water district to the Anti-metering law.

Digital ID
hln001189
Physical Identifier
Box 25 Folder 80-11 Vol. 7 of 7 Part 1 LVL&W Co. Sale of Water Production of UPRR Co.
    Details
    Citation

    hln001189. Union Pacific Railroad Collection, 1828-1995. MS-00397. Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Las Vegas, Nevada. http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1q52jd0v

    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at?special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Standardized Rights Statement
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Digital Processing Note
    Manual transcription
    Language

    English

    Format
    application/pdf

    LAW OFFICES OF SUBJECT O MELVENY& MYERS 433 SOUTH SPRING STREET LOS ANGELES 13 October 21st 19 5 5 HOLLYWOOD OFFICE 6920 SUNSET BOULEVARD LOS ANGELES 26 CABLE ADDRESS "MOMS" IN REPLY REFER TO B-2805-a LAS VEGAS VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Mr. Thomas A. Campbell President, Las Vegas Valley Water District 135 South Fourth Street Las Vegas, Nevada Dear Tom: In accordance with your earlier request, I am enclosing herewith the original and two copies of our opinion on the "anti-metering" law. As previously indi- cated to you, this is no "guarantee" that a court might not go off the deep end and hold the anti-metering legis- lation applicable to the District. However, as expressed in our opinion, it is our view that if a court were called upon to determine the matter it would hold that the Dis- trict is not subject to the anti-metering law. I expect to be absent on my vacation until November 14th. I will attempt to drop off and see you on my way through Las Vegas, either upon my departure or upon my return. Very truly yours, O'MELVENY & MYERS By Franklin T. Hamilton FTH:gv Encls.