Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000197 51

Information

Digital ID
upr000197-051
    Details
    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Publisher
    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    (L e t t e r h e a d o f ) \ ROY A. WEES C o n s u ltin g E n g in e e r P a c i f i c M u tual B u ild in g 660 M arket S t r e e t San F r a n c is c o 4 , C a l i f o r n i a November 2 3 , 1951 C 0 P Y M r. Edward C. Renwick A s s is t a n t G e n e ra l S o l i c i t o r O nion P a c i f i c R a ilr o a d Company Re: F i l e 4705-11-22 422 West S ix th S t r e e t Los A n g e le s 14, C a l i f o r n i a D ear M r. Renw lck: 1 was p le a s e d t o r e c e i v e you r l e t t e r o f November 15 and thus be brou gh t up t o d a t e on th e p r o g r e s s o f th e w ork and y ou r t h in k in g . I have been p o n d e rin g o v e r th e s u g g e s tio n r a is e d by you as to th e p o s s ib le a d va n ta g e s and d is a d v a n ta g e s i f th e W ater Company owned and o p e ra te d b o th th e p ro d u c tio n and d i s t r i b u t i o n f a c i l i t ­i e s as an in d ep en d en t company. I f th e a s s e ts o f th e P r o d u c tio n Company, as re p re s e n te d by i t s w a te r p ro d u c tio n and tr a n s m is s io n f a c i l i t i e s , w ere t r a n s fe r r e d t o the D is t r ib u t io n Gompany and th e l a t t e r d iv o r c e d from I t s o th e r c o r p o r a t e a c t i v i t i e s and r e o r g a n iz e d , th e o w n ers h ip , th rou gh s e ­c u r i t i e s to be Is s u e d , would n e c e s s a r ily have to be h e ld by Union P a c i f i c . I say " n e c e s s a r ily " f o r th e rea son t h a t I do n o t b e lie v e th e r e would be any p u b lic m arket a t th e p r e s e n t tim e f o r two p r in ­c i p a l r e a s o n s , nam ely because o f : 1. The p r e s e n t and r e c e n t p a s t u n s a t is fa c t o r y earn ­in g s . 2. The c r i t i c a l w a te r su p p ly s it u a t io n . The most u rg e n t c o n d it io n t o f o l l o w up on i s ite m ( 1 ) , t h a t l a , t o keep a t th e ta s k o f s e c u r in g th e n e c e s s a r y e a rn in g s th rou gh h ig h e r r a t e s f o r w a te r s e r v i c e . The q u e s tio n th en a r i s e s , i s th e r e any a d va n tage in ch an gin g th e c o r p o r a te s e t- u p , even though th e ow n ersh ip in e f f e c t rem ains unchanged and because o f t h a t , th e r e g u la t o r y a u t h o r it y and many o f th e w a te r cu stom ers a re n ot to o much con cern ed i f th e " r i c h ” U nion P a c i f i c d o es n o t earn th e g e n e r a lly a c c e p te d r a t e o f r e t u r n . B e fo r e exam in in g some o f th e c o n s id e r a t io n s t h a t management