Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

Letter from Walter R. Bracken (Las Vegas) to F. R. McNamee (Los Angeles), August 14, 1913

Information

Date
1913-08-14
Description

Bracken wrote to the company lawyer to find a permanent solution to a yearly problem of gate vandalism at the Stewart burial plot.

Digital ID
hln000666
Physical Identifier
Box 15 Folder R-18 Sale of Water - General
    Details
    Citation

    hln000666. Union Pacific Railroad Collection, 1828-1995. MS-00397. Special Collections and Archives, University Libraries, University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Las Vegas, Nevada. http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d11n81m5n

    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at?special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Standardized Rights Statement
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Digital Processing Note
    Manual transcription
    Language

    English

    Format
    application/pdf

    Las Vegas, Nev., Aug. 14, 1913. Mr. F. R. McNamee, Los Angeles, Cal. Dear Sir: The same old water trouble concerning the Stewart's four inches has broken out again and if anything a little more intense this time than before. The present lessors of the ranch called on me yesterday to go with them to inspect the flood gate and I found that the wear which was installed by Mr. Jessup a year or so ago, the outlet of same has been chopped out with an axe so that, instead of 4" passing through there was, at a very conservative estimate, 40". I called on Mrs. Stewart personally and explained the matter to her and have temporarily repaired the wear so that she is getting all of 4" on her ground. Mrs. Stewart advises that her agreement is, that there must be 4" delivered to her on the four acre burial plot. As this matter is the source of a yearly trouble, I would be very glad indeed if it could be worked out in some way whereby the delivery of water would be a permanent one and save these yearly troubles over the water question. If, as Mrs. Stewart says, her agreement calls for the delivery of 4" on the burial plot, would it not be well to secure enough second-hand pipe to convey this water from the present wear instead of trying to run same through open ditch? Please let me have your advice concerning this matter. Yours truly,