upr000090 65

Hr. Leo A . MeKamee December 2, 1952 - page 3 With respect to sub-division *1* X have made a slight clarification in that, which X District*116^ Wil1 b® ob*J®ctlonabl® to the * haJ6 added, a those advances by nseuwb -dsiuvbi-ddeirvsi sifoonr rtheel ateiovnes trtuoc - ?ofthh?e fvWa?tetr9 rC.omamipnaSn ys’us br^uelcets taon dr erfeugnudlsa tpiuornssu,a nt which I have felt advisable to refer to in the proposal. Possibly you can improve upon the wording or possibly you prefer to include such a provision in the contract to be prepared for the sale of the properties. That is something you can think over. The balance of the draft follows your proposal of October 15th. _*« . « * expect to arrive in Vegas Wednesday night n?U«.af<1*wr- Campbell and any of the Directors ablet’ blThuuCrissd5aryic tt.h ew aa4tt h taon dS O wiolvle rg etth iisn, tI ouwcihl lw ibteh ayvoaui.l­For your information, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. ©f the c&onnt!r a1c th af5o ra tmhee® trien-gl owciatthi roens poefc tt het o pitphee form lines submitted with your letter of November 5th. and we made certain changes in the location or pro­posed location of some of the facilities, and l a ® having new maps prepared. As soon as they are re- ceived I will send you a draft of the contract which * be attached to your new proposal. It t5_o° ^w,h o© h?X willf isneanld fao r®co piyf, aacncde pttoa blteh e tDoi sMtrr. icMto,n tgboumtery, I do not want to have it executed by either party until the new proposal of the District is in a for® tihnecilru dfiinnga la llc onesxihdiebriattsi osno. I can send it to Omaha for Yours very truly, E. I. BENNETT