upr000276 192

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 You tiavo m ft toe m m of rooorve for replacements, Hr* Ooamolly, is that figured on say particular percentage tints baa1st A. That’s figured #» 44* Thai’s depreciation taken o»«p a parted of tS years on pipe linos at their actual value. Q., I'<o you make s variation on that depreciation percentage in any way or de yet* f i p p « 44 straight? A. 4$ straight* At o»e time we figured &4 on part of ©or lines* teat they wouldn’t last a Sd-year period « | wo wore sow-pellod to amt to Sft-ysmr period, using 4l. * $&£.*' The Ilensroble Cosswlsslon ihOBli haws allowed a reas­onable valuation m the water shown to haws been actually eensua- M alsa for the water appropriated, owned aaS available by your petitioner for diversion sad use at any time for maxi®*® re* quirss&oat* during the hot womths of July and August sod oxtraer- Aimary use in easa of firs, the mncontradiotad testimony of pe­titioner’s witnesses short that at certain tines the requirements for petitioner's aarvloa la &as Yoga* is store than double the fcftwl of the average eemsitstpttom for tha year 1430 found by your Cob® i» stem to ha f«4i cubic feat .par seeond* See tits testimony of 1* b* Perkins, VaXmatiem Engineer, limes 1 to 7, page 77 of Transcript, as follows* *%?* The total it based cm a valuation of f*44i A# ha base it ost that valuation and have doubled it because » believe it is necessary at all times bo have double thst smouat to give maximum service hare* There ora times, the peak sooths Is the year, wham that won’t do. to figure the average for fir# protaction amt foil amt complete application during the hot months* that is average for It months*9 Hr* Perkins estimates the value of your petitioner’s water m his basis of comparison* with Southern California at #30,000* per cable foot per seeond, and am this beets he placed the value