Information
Digital ID
upr000031-014
Permalink
4 To: Mr, W.R, Bracken: 1-23-42 rights and in general were comparable with the land sold to —Miller et al. However, it should be noted that except for the Russell sale these lands adjoined a developed subdivision and were in the line of growth of the City and that values had generally increased for lands available for subdivision purposes. About ten years had elapsed since 1913>ln which time the growth of the City has become assured. This consideration did not apply as to the Russell parcel in the same degree A& in the other sales and I would say the value of the Russell parcel would have been #60.00 per acre in 1913 and it ion on that date would be applicable to the
