upr000160 107

f-*«r* waiter ft# t©Ut-S 1 1 January 10, 1952 s ta n d t h e t i t i s H r. fm lsi& e r’s sug.$#sbi©n t h a t th e f t * c l l i t i e s o f th e VflBM Cmpmf ho tr a n s f e r r e d W th e fepil. a t -©as®, b a t t h a t th ey ' o n ly be t r a n s f e r r e d to ..the - Union .p a c if ic a t th e tiro® th e Union P a c i f ic i s ready to sa k e a t r a n s f e r , o f th e ''s y s te m to th e ? D i s t r i c t • I t lin k i t -would "'be u n d e s ira b le f o r th e . f a c i l i t i e s t o be ..tro U sfe rred t o th e Union P a c if ic at. 'any e a r l i e r ’d d te b ecause 2 do n et 'b e lie v e i t i s d e s ir a b le f o r . th e Onion |b a i f l e a t a.-.y tiaw r t o a c t u a l l y conduct o p e ra tio n s a s e d i s t r i b u t o r of mtar. la o r d e r 't o do so I t would have t o o b ta in a c e r t i f i c a t e of. p u b lic convenience .and n e c e s ­s i t y fro® -the- la b i l e . S e rv ic e {kjcriiseiof*, end 1 b e lie v e th e P u b lic S erv ice Coraatlaeion would be very s u s p ic io u s ©f any a ttem p t by th e P a ilro a d Company t o in c o rp o ra te t h e d i s t r i b u t i o n system in th e p r o p e r tie s o f th e S e l l - • ro ad Company. th e C o o n issio n would- l* » e d te ie ly jump to th e. c o n c lu sio n t h a t th e l e l l r o e d Company ?%*'» a t t e s t i n g t o bw[y th e w a te r .d is t r ib u t io n s y s t e m in - th e E a ilro a d p r o p e r tie s f o r ' some u l t e r i o r m otive* i f e l l o f t b s t r a n s f e r s were made a t th e same tim e , we would n o t fa c e t h i s problem* H r.' B u lsiste r s u r r s e t s t h a t th e XAftSl convey to t h e Union P a c if ic a l l o f th e la n d n e c e ss a ry f o r th e o p e ra - t i c s o f th e W ater Company w e t of I t s main tr a c k s cx- c o o t-'th e ©reel o ccu p ied by th e shop grounds, and f a c i l i ­t i e s , b u t in c lu d in g th e fro n ta g e o n 'C h a rle s to n boule­vard* I t would a p p e a r t o m t h a t i f th e w ater system were. toVfee d esisted t o ' t h e .'D is tr i c t , i t would be b e s t to . d onate a s l i t t i e la u d .fee. p o s s ib le * .. I would th in k that th e only-' lan d which, sh o u ld be d o n ated w ould be th e la n d ii»ediatelyv© urroundlng'..tli© w e lls and r e s e r v o i r s and a r i g h t © f way;‘f o r tra n s m is s io n l i n e s t o tfe# d i s t r i b u t i o n system oast; of the. tra c k s* T h is may, in f a c t , - ‘b e '!r* H u lo im r f$ id e e • ."t th e tim e we p re s e n te d ©ur ev id en ce In th e r a t e c a s e we d ssisfu a te d 679*42 a c re s o f la n d in - th e ..v ic in ity o f: th e w e lls "as 'being weiwi* b e s r iu g la n d and oEClUded from th e proposed r a t# bane a l l land ly in g e r s t o f th e mtmr .f ie ld -and w est o f th e t r a c t » c o n s titu t in g some 5 5 1 .a c re s o f la n d , I b e lie v e t h a t much -of t h i s e x e liid -