upr000177 485

Las Vegas - February 10, 1950 W 2>l-24 Hr. Wa. Reinhardt: Xour 1*tter February 9, file fL® 2259, proposed agreement with Mast er1- 7g3r3a&f,t rHoemgeasr diton g ©over extension of water main in Thelma Lane. _ - . Xou are rig h t in your assumption that Lot 13 rlook 1 , Tract # 4 W ill be served from water main eon-struoted in H illside Plaoe under HLD 2128 (QA-to472). However Lot 1 of Hook 2 w ill be served from the new Thelma Lane extension to be oonstruoted under HLJ> 2259, Xou are oorreot In your assumption that Lot 2 o f Hook 3» Traot 4 w ill be served from the water main oonstruoted by Hr. SpeSktor under agreement HLD 2129 (CA-L0507) and we w ill revise the proposed agreement, KUI 2259, to eliminate Lot 2, Hook % With referenoe to the la s t paragraph of your le t t e r , please re fe r to p rin t, t it le d Exhibit "A* dated Deoember 20, 1946 showing lo ts in Hook 7: in the sale o f land from Master Graft to Speoktor Lot 7 of Hook 7 was inoluded in ths portion sold to Speoktor and refund# fo r Same w&s included in Speoktor1s contr&ot with the Water Company. The remaining s ix lo ts in Bloek 7 were then resubdivided to make seven lo t s and we are refund­ing td J 4*®11®** Graft on the revised seven lo ts In Hook 7. lamer the oirouastanoes 1 presume no revlelom of NLD 22k6 with Master Graft w ill be nemos sary. Will you please i f you concur that the only revision before us now is to eliminate "Lot 2 in Hook 3" from proposed agreement ML® 2259, and X w ill arrange accordingly. A. M. Folger