Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000008 14

Information

Digital ID
upr000008-014
    Details
    Member of
    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Publisher
    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    Los Angelas, Arril 5, 1911. Bill 1S59-C. Fr. ”, I. Bettis, ... V ice Vreridnnt a net Au3 i t or. Lear Bir: I have your joint favor of Parch 31st relative reappraieemont of lots in Las veyas townsit©, which I have gone over carefully and have the following si-great ions to rah©: - In Block 3, Lota 14, 15 and 16. fitepc lota should, I think, he reserved for otir c or.bina1 ion Company rooming hoi«se and. recreation building which we propose to erect at Las Vegas. I think this should face on Fain Street, and location of Block 3 would he the most desirable one. • Block 5, Lot 24, suggest price of *300 instead of 130, for the reason that the only remaining front lot in this Block, Ho.7, you have appraised at *500, which. Ithink is all right, but T should think a rear lot in this same Block should be worth more than half as much as the front lot. Block 12, Lots 6 and 7, I ” or;1.d suggest *300 each instead of *g50, as -they tktc© Lot 24 in ^lock 5 upon which I suggested voice of £300. Block 17. 7. note you cut all'the prices ir. this block, presumably because of its being saloon block, I do not think we should encourage more saloons by putting down the price of these lots, and think we should hold them, all at the original appraised value...