upr000065 225

(bcc - MMrr.. WC.a lHv.i n JMo.h nsCoonr)y T Eel I IB Docket So. 127 Los Angeles, February Jhr. ¥. ft* Ken*«i (cc — Mr* A* i* tofldard Mr* Reinhardt Mr* i« 1* Halsiter Itr* A. M* Sutton) Mr* m w. rieowiek, Mr* &« 0* ^srson sad Mr* i* A* Maag had a conference with Mr. Robert A* Alloa, Choir- amm of tho Sevada fubltc .Service Cosaaiaoioa, Is Carson City on January 23 rd e#ae«rsisg tho above mentioned oeso* Mr* Alloa, at least Indirectly, conceded that tho Sooolooisa had used tho wrong eojital figures with respect to tho Railroad property la tto decision of August 11| 1951. Discussions wore had concerning tho procedure for providing tho water Company with additional roliof, and Mr* Alios indicated that ho would not look with favor up­on re-opening thie case* Ho recommended that tho Company file e sow aehedule ©f rate# end promised that fee would sot it for early hearing and decide tho caao promptly* However ho said ho would not pro—lodge tho coco*-Ho eng* jested as the only alternative going ahead with tho court actios and lotreducing additional evidence is that coco so that the ease would be again referred to the Coaasie- sion for actios prior to final court determlnatleR* The conference closed with so definite conclusions as to what actios would be taken by tho Water Company• The following day Mr. Eeswick again talked with Mr. Allen and advised kin that he would sot be willing to recommend to the nanagonont» nor did he think the manage- meat would approve, the filing of a new schedule of rates. He told Mr. Alien that if the Company could sot obtain re­lief under its original filing, It would be purposeless t© start an entirely sew proceeding, therefore the only al­ternative was the prosecution or the Court actios if the Ceagftissien would net consider e petition for rebeariJig* 1, 1951 X£gTj