man000176 47

#3 Mr. Spencer L. Butterfield 6-17-53 Into an agreement with the Company whereby the Company agrees to refund a stipulated amount of revenues received. In the second situation there are no "capital expenditures made by the Company” and for this reason the situation is not covered b y the C o m m i s s i o n ’s order. Lastly, If the District must acquir^ responsible for the operation of and the rend4 vice to the Charleston Heights Subdivision, i1 able that the Public Service CommlssIcm^aKSr extension should be constructed in 8^-«aone3 Water District, pay for and be .ng of water ser-leems only reason- ?der that an Tactory to the We would recommend ttoafc/the Dikyriet seek an amendment of the C o m m i s s i o n ’s order, to<jpi are constructed and are theresu payment therefor shall be^puswmai! tract between the Compar the order provide that/xfrlor tl the plans and specifications for^ submitted to the Waterl district if the water facilities conveyed to the District, fhe provisions of the con- ;rlct. We also suggest that auction of said extension, Crater facilities shall be its approval* It la/fyt^xnide) he provides yog jtrlth hi; of the order i f f the .Publd appear that t&ip is a maj the District'a xocal cqj 'that Mr. Montgomery at the time t4 on will also forward copies S e r v i c e C o m m l s s l o n . It would further h r which properly should be handled by [el. Very truly yours, O'MELVENY & MYSRS By FTHsgv c c j ^Mr, Thomas A. Campbell Mr, 0. William Coulthard Mr, James M, Montgomery Mr. Leo A. McNamee Mr. £• E. Bennett Franklin T, Hamilton