Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000133 176

Information

Digital ID
upr000133-176
Permalink
http://n2t.net/ark:/62930/d1f47k05c
Details
Member of
Taxes - general company (2 of 2)
Rights
This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
Digital Provenance
Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
Publisher
University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

C o u n t y t a x e s f o r l o t s las Vegas, Nev., April 25, 1912, Mr, H« I, Bettis, Vice Pres,, Las Vegas Land & Water Co,, Los Angeles, Cal. Dear Mr, Bettis; Referring to your note asking to advise what you should answer to enclosed letter, would say I have had a talk with the assessor, and I find that he is going to place a valuation of #250,00 on corner lots and #200,00 on inside lots of block Sixteen, This is just double to what it was last year, but considering the revised laws for the State of Nevada for 1912,' Section 3623, I do not believe it would be of any advantage to make complaint against his assessed value. If the assess­or* s valuation is increased, it will correspondingly reduce the assessment .efesrgerr I beleive it will be better to let the matter rest with .him in this manner until such time as the assessment roll is made up for the County Commissioners, WRB-AH. Yours very truly, A g e n t .