Information
Details
More Info
Transcription
The cross examination by the City Attorney indicated that he was attempting to drive home two principal points: 1. That the separation of water production from water distribution results in inefficient^"and costly operation. 2. That the Railroad makes excessive bills upon the Water C ompany for water furnished. Mr. Wehe*s testimony was based upon his original report and a supplemental report which has been recently prepared by him containing the aetual results of operation for the year 1950 and an estimate of the results of operation for the year 1951. I am enclosing three copies of the Supplemental Report ,2. <Gppies of the Supplemental Report are -astso being sent to I h<=> H ^ Messrs. Hulsizer^ Sutton and Bockes. We expect to complete our showing at the next hearing and hope that it will be possible to have the protestants conclude their showing at the same hearing. Wm. Reinhardt Ends
