upr000090 38

«it ' <&* - Mr* L*o A. McHaaee December 2 , 1952 - page 3 with respect to sub-division *E* I have sade a slight clarification in that, which I do not believe will be District. objectionable to the I have added a new sub-division relative to those advances by sub-dividers for the construc­tion of water ssins subjsct to refunds pursuant to the Water Company's rules'and regulations, which I have felt advisable to refer to in the proposal. Possibly you can improve upon the wording or possibly you prefer to include such a provision in the contract to be prepared for the sale of the properties. That Is something you can think over. The balance of the draft follows your proposal of October 15th. I expect to arrive in Vegas Wednesday night and if you and Mr. Campbell and any of the Directors of the District want to go over this, 1 will be avail­able Thursday the 4th and will get in touch with you. For your information, Mr. Montgomery, Mr. Adamson and I had a meeting with respect to the form of the contract for the re-location of the pipe line® submitted with your letter of November 5th, and we made certain changes in the location or pro­posed location of some of the facilities, and I am having new maps prepared. As soon as they are re­ceived 1 will send you a draft of the contract Which I think should be attached to your new proposal. It should be in final form if acceptable to Mr. Montgomery, to whom I will send a copy, and to the District, but I do not want to have it executed by either party until the new proposal of the District is in j fora tIhnecilru dfiinnga jaL llc onesxihdiebriattsi osno. I can send it to Omaha for Tours very truly, EEB:MF B . i'J* • BEKNETT