Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

upr000197 70

Information

Digital ID
upr000197-070
    Details
    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Publisher
    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    4 ©use December 21, 1951 accou n t e f th e Webers produced from t h i s w a l l . I. s » n o t c e r t a i n why ®n a p p r o p r ia t io n m s n o t f i l e d . However I b e l i e v e i t was because t h e r e was an u n c e r t a in t y a® t o w h eth er i t was n ecea s& ry t© a p p r o p r ia t e th e w a ter from th e w a ll • S e c t io n 79®? o f th e Nevada Com piled Laws p ro ­v id e s mm fo llo w ® * “A ll underground waters, save and except percolating water, the c o u rse and boundaries o f which are incapable o f determination, a re h ereby declared to be subject to a p p r o p r ia ­tio n under th e la w s o f the state re la tin g to the appropriation and use o f water** I t has never been le g a lly determined whether the waters in the Las Vegas Artesian Stela ere percolating waters, the course and boundary of which are incapable'o f deter­mination, end therefore 1 sm assuming that i t may have been thought that i t was not necessary to f ile an appro­priation fo r th is u . I find from our f i l e s that our Newsda attorney* Leo Mo&anee, f i r s t raised the question o f the d e s ir a b ility o f protecting our water supply by appropriations In 1924 a f­t e r the Railroad had fir s t, developed' a very l a r g e flow o f w a te r from rteeien '.n il ho* 1 located user the Big Springs. S in c e that tine the Railroad, as w e l l ns o t h e r s , has f o l ­lowed the practice of protecting water developed fro® w ells by appropriation. ' cation 7944 e f the Kevads con-p iled lew® provides that say person desiring to appropri­ate any o f the public waters or to change the place or diversion,, manner o f use or place o f "use oFn"\^Ter"llT-,l'r , I ___ .b is i s th e s e c t io n under which we have p roceed ed t o sa k e o r i g i n a l a p p r o p r ia t io n s and I s e e no re a s o n why we sh ou ld n ot be a b le t o s e c u re th e t r a n s f e r o f ou r e x i s t i n g R a ilr o a d a p p r o p r ia t io n t© th e w e l l in th e shop grou n d s i f t h a t w e l l can be r e c o n s t i­tu t e d so m to p r o v id e a s u it a b le s u p p ly * I t m igh t a l ­s o h% p o s s ib le t© t r a n s f e r th e R a ilr o a d A p p r o p r ia tio n t o a new w e l l in % s u it a b le l o c a t i o n w hich would d e v e lo p s u f­f i c i e n t w a te r . 1 do n ot know what th e a t t it u d e o f th e r l ^ t c ^ H sh a ll sa k e"a n fep p lT cT tlF n t o t 'h e 'v t e .ie