Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

pho036445-395

Information

Creator
Photographer (pht): deLespinasse, Hank, 1943-2017
Date
1971-02-16
Digital ID
pho036445-395
    Details
    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. Copyright is owned by the University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Please see the UNLV Libraries Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Standardized Rights Statement
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Digital Processing Note
    OCR transcription
    Language

    English

    Format
    image/tiff

    Threaten

    To Block

    Gambling IM SUN|5^

    I Chanting groups of welfare mothers I yesterday pledged to take their fight I against the State Welfare Division to the I Strip in a “domr-die” demonstration in I early March.

    I Dr. George Wiley, executive director of the militant National Welfare Rights

    I Organization (NWRO), vowed the wel-

    I fare recipients would be joined by other national organizations, including peace,

    ' and civil rights groups.

    It was, only one incident
    tinning series of actions on several fronts related to welfare terminations this winter of more than 3,000 Nevada citizens.

    In rapid succession yesterday —Federal Judge Roger Foley dis­ solved a temporary restraining order

    against the Welfare Division and set a hearing tomorrow to decide if the suit

    will become a class action. 1

    —Groups of welfare recipients and 1 participants in “Operation Nevada,” the ]

    drive to block the welfare terminations,J staged demonstrations at the Welfare®

    Division offices in Reno and Las Ve® gas. ■

    —Entertainer Sammy Davis Jr., me®

    with officials of Operation Nevada andw

    said he would assist,in working for posLl tive solutions in Nevada. fl

    Foley’s decision to dissolve the tern- 1 porary restraining order which prevents ]

    the state from terminating recipients I without notices and fair hearings, was J

    effected because there had been no mo

    tion or order declaring the temporary restrainer a class action. The hearing 1

    I

    I