upr000060 110

Las Yeg&a «* October 18, «2H Hr* fc Reinhardts { m Hr* E* 1* Bennett ) Su -plecmtiMg my letter October Xbth, ragerdiag request fra® Milo Bsrties OcsasdUsion Httt we redlsasliy Jgpgp for water. service furnished to auto courts and motels* As outdated In Hr* Bennett1# letter* October 17th, we have considered the loss which would he sustained by the suggea ted compromise, and find th t the charge# for toilet and baths in the 53 auto oourts listed in state- stent attached to our letter September Xbt& would total t3do*50 per month# ?h& offset or edit against this loss varies with the vacancies and tourist business In Las f«®a#f for instance during February the auto court- vacancy allowaaoes totaled 1278*50, therefore the net lose to the water company would m $32*00 per month or $S®3*00 per year m this basis. This is considerable, but not in co^carlaon with the loss of 1720*90 per month, or $8,650 per year which wotsld result from application of the hotel rate which the petitioners request* A* K* Folg-ur