Search the Special Collections and Archives Portal

man000177 49

Information

Digital ID
man000177-049
    Details
    Rights
    This material is made available to facilitate private study, scholarship, or research. It may be protected by copyright, trademark, privacy, publicity rights, or other interests not owned by UNLV. Users are responsible for determining whether permissions are necessary from rights owners for any intended use and for obtaining all required permissions. Acknowledgement of the UNLV University Libraries is requested. For more information, please see the UNLV Special Collections policies on reproduction and use (https://www.library.unlv.edu/speccol/research_and_services/reproductions) or contact us at special.collections@unlv.edu.
    Digital Provenance
    Digitized materials: physical originals can be viewed in Special Collections and Archives reading room
    Publisher
    University of Nevada, Las Vegas. Libraries

    L a s Vegas Valley W ater D istrict - pg. 5 May 4 , 1953 I am unable to find handily where the rule against perpetuities is involved in case of a covenant in the nature of a restriction such as this would be. In other words, the railroad company is to give the dis­trict an instrument in which the railroad covenants that no wells will be drilled upon the lands retained by it, for a period of 50 years. M r. Hamilton and I discussed this "covenant - condition" proposition over the phone, and I will have to give it some more study. LAMrbcs copy to: O'Melveny & Meyers 433 South Spring Street Los Angeles 13, California Attention: M r. Franklin T . Hamilton Re: Your No. B-2805. Leo A. McNamee