Information
Digital ID
upr000065-175
Permalink
7- Comparison of 80* of Consumr, 8«w isrvioea, ;::.Ma?s. L*a ¥«$&# ordinary exp *!***», Axereg# ftavenae ».n<5 aast of operation pAr 0on*user SO. of ooitfttiaarft - y#«r end 80. t nm? services during year Btr^nufts ^eter sales ftL«c«ll ane jus fetal iifeBSftae.a Ssparviaory fepd -iffiae v-. K&lnten&ttae M> * foUl xm mm mjgjgit. II 333. f 101 10 001 477 ^ &6? nm 1210 624 K ? 253 046^ $:m 150 wm fyil.1 ^ JlZS' £222 14* ^ • 2:19 798 / $305-350 130 719 p* *22 6*1 700 JL.JS1 - 44.?&lr HJM $65 074 ? 383^ If* 800 BatlrasientS . 7 326 ' -%Ui, sft««t DtiTQA.2 *36 Auditors ekaoii >00 IWt 8 li'tOr--&8 8 ftetlraiaeitt# Ordinary ':^y».mm Aaertege ev*mue per eonaunar ^165 074 | Average oast of or-erat!>m per eoneaas^r 7.BX L 4. A .'« u 12 004 7 508 Iff 319 Iff 300 %8.55 %0.|3 1.72 %.?3
