upr000208 106

3 the same p erio d , the in te r Company received 907,437,300 g a llo n s, cos tit*? $ .0403 per M g a llo n s. Of th is c o s t, # .01953 was paid to the H&ilroad Company, t h is payment to ta lin g (>17,723,93 in c lu is s the i t eras o f 6 per eent in te r e s t and 4 per cent d ep recia tio n on tho Eailro&d Company’ s investm ent, or t o t a l fix e d charges o f 10 per cent plus insurance, torrae, m in ten?, nee and operation . Oosfmny, in clod teg in t e r e s t and A eprectetion (paid to the HaHroad) In Las Ve.gss, perhaps aecentmtod. by the c i t y ’ s p roxim ity to the new could he accomplished in the m y o f reducing consumption when the t o ta l cost par S g a llon s i s as low as that e x is tin g i n Las 7«gss. For example, I f the aster Company employed men to p o lic e m a te on the p a rt o f commercial users, such p o lic in g would cost not le s s then #1,500 per year, without any increase in revenue to su bstan tiate She Wat or Company rec e iv e d in revenue $51,664.02, equal to s . -he to ta l expenses incurred $ .0560 per by the %,ter