upr000284 79

You, o f course, are fa m ilia r w ith the fa c t th at Case Ho. 1207 i s s t i l l under submission by the Commission, t h is bein g “In the M atter o f the Water Service Furnished the Residents o f the City o f Las Vegas by the Las Vegas Land & Water Company11, t h is case, you r e c a l l , was heard in September 1950 and p r io r to the term ination th ereo f an agreement was reached th at we would i n s t a l l pumps b e fo re th is summer, a l l o f which has been done. The testimony o f our expert w itn esses, Mr. Robinson, D is t r ic t Engineer, U .S . G eo lo gica l Survey f o r the Ground D iv isio n , and Mr. Hugh Shamberger, now State Engineer, were s u b s ta n tia lly to the e ffe c t th at there was a g reat o v e rd ra ft in the underground basin and th at the con tin ual d r i l l i n g o f w e lls would, in the lo n g run, in crease th at o v e rd ra ft. Mr. Shamberger f e l t th at new w e lls could be d r i l l e d and a la r g e r water supply secured as an emergency measure pending the a c q u is itio n o f water from other sources which he f e l t was d r a s t ic a lly n ecessary. He fu rth e r state d that i f the d i s t r i c t d id not go to some ou tsid e source, the state would probably have to r e s t r i c t d r i l l i n g . There i s , o f course, the danger that i f we f i l e the a p p lic a tio n proposed and pressed i t , that the C ity o f f i c i a l s would in s is t on a fu rth e r h earin g in Case No. 1207 and demand that the Water Company e ith e r d r i l l more w e lls o r acquire p re se n tly producing w e lls pending fu rth e r in v e s tig a tio n as to the n ec essity o f going to Lake Mead o r pending any oth er excuse they might think o f . I b e lie v e th is m atter should be con­sid ered se rio u sly when con sid eration i s bein g given to f i l i n g the proposed a p p lic a tio n . Mr. Wffi. Reinhardt page 7 July 6 , 1951 E. E. Bennett